Autonomy: An Ideological Link Between Democratic Equality and Localism

IVotedpic

America’s schools are one of the first places where we learn to become citizens. It is the place where we go to learn about our history, our values, and how we will contribute to the common good. Scholars often refer to this vital aim of schooling as the democratic equality goal. Educational researcher David Labaree explains that “ . . . a democratic society cannot persist unless it prepares all of its young with equal care to take on the full responsibilities of citizenship in a competent manner.” Further, democratic equality involves the building of a common life among citizens, a collective vision of the past, present, and future of the country.

This goal does not only entail citizenship training, however. It also promotes equal treatment of all students regardless of background and equal access to opportunities. With these additional ends in mind, one might imagine that a central, nationalized system of education would be most effective in ensuring that all students receive an equal education in preparation for their future roles as active, engaged citizens. As cited in the 1983 national education report A Nation at Risk, “A high level of shared education is essential to a free, democratic society and to the fostering of a common culture.”

However, the American public school system could not be more different from this picture. Instead, our system has always been defined by its unique reliance on local control of schools even in this day of policies like standards-based accountability. How is it possible that the democratic equality goal is held so strongly while localism has been so deeply entrenched in our administration and leadership of schools? Perhaps the answer is that Americans deeply value one tenet that bridges the gap between these sets of conflicting ideals: individual autonomy. Both democratic equality and localism value autonomy for both individual citizens and institutional bodies. In fact, autonomy is so highly valued that it is built into the very structures that govern America and its schools, leaving a legacy of pervasive autonomy under which school leadership still operates today.

The idea that individual autonomy actually contributes to the common good goes back hundreds of years in America. The Founders felt that power corrupts, so power was purposely fragmented throughout the federal government in order to avoid insurmountable power resting with any particular person or group. After all, they had just rebelled against a distant king. Further, power was greatly localized with a great deal of authority given to the states, which is further fragmented to local levels. Belief in the virtue of the government upholding various levels of autonomy only grew with the aging of the republic and was solidified by the rise of the Native Protestant Ideology and the common school movement. In his landmark book Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780-1860, renowned education scholar Carl Kaestle discusses how this thinking promoted ideas of social morality, character, and the role of personal industry in defining merit. However, he notes that the ideology also promoted values that perpetuated the roles of autonomous individuals and institutions. It was the virtue of free ability to act and self-govern, proponents argued, that made the collective viable and free.

These values promoting autonomy had serious and lasting implications for the structure of American school leadership throughout the last two centuries and into this one, and local autonomy is perhaps its most impactful, if not its most prominent, feature. This proclivity toward autonomy derives from the belief that proximity yields effectiveness, that is, those who are nearest to students and schools are best able to determine what is best for them. Just as was the case in America’s early history, Americans still hold a deeply entrenched belief that distant power is a threat. As Thomas Jefferson once said, “That government is best that governs least,” and Americans still greatly employ this belief in the governance and structuring of its institutions. The design for leadership of the American education system is a prime example of this. David Cohen and James Spillane point out that it was purposely designed to be intensely local and distrustful of centralized power.

This emphasis and predominance of localism plays out at every tier of the system, with the greatest amount of control being concentrated at the district level. Unlike virtually all other national education systems, Cohen and Spillane also note that “. . . direct federal governance is marginal.” While educational power is officially and de facto concentrated in the central government in most countries, constitutional authority over education in America resides with the states. Even at that level, however, comparatively little power is leveraged by states over local education agencies at the district level, although this dynamic has changed somewhat in the last few decades with the rise of the standards movement and legislation such as “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB). In his well-known 1975 book Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study, researcher Dan Lortie also makes a key point regarding local leadership and its selection. Not only are schools governed by local leaders, but they are ultimately governed by the citizens who elect them. Thus, voters have a major voice in how they want their schools run and their children taught. Leadership could not possibly be more local than that.

This entrenched belief in the virtues of local educational control has ossified into a dynamic that has seemed to rule at all levels of educational leadership throughout the 20th century and into the 21st: the basic bargain. It is simple in theory and pervasive in practice. Essentially, leaders at each level of organization agree with those in the administrative level below that in exchange for carrying out directives, the operating bodies get to choose how to implement them. Thus, the basic bargain is the definition of laissez faire management. This extreme level of autonomy is a staple of the American system, where leadership is traditionally “long on prescription, short of description,” as Lortie describes it. As a result, states, districts, schools, and even classrooms have been led in whatever way leaders at the corresponding levels have seen fit. They have been free to do their jobs as they wish so long as they have gotten their jobs done.

Autonomy is no longer so simple. With greater accountability measures enacted by legislation such as NCLB, education leaders are now under pressure to produce results. Other efforts are mounting from groups such as the National Governors Association to create more standard guidance for instructional content and materials. However, it is difficult to foresee what these efforts will mean for school leadership—and administrative autonomy—at all levels.

School Lunches from Around the World: Beware the Mystery Meat

school lunches

neverseconds.blogspot.co.uk / Via Never Seconds/ Martha Payne

While America’s school children spent Thursday gorging themselves on turkey and football, the rest of the world’s students were going about business as usual. That, of course, means school lunches. A family member related to me this weekend that he once attended a school where no one was allowed to go out for recess until they had finished every last bite of their lunch. He noted significantly that your best friend was always the kid who was willing to eat your split pea soup for you.

Ever wonder what kids around the world are eating for lunch? Check out this great post from Buzzfeed!

Even Educators Could Use Some Enlightenment Sometimes

10-30Despite the best of intentions, educators do not always understand where students and their families are coming from. I learned of this troubling lack of enlightenment and compassion among some educators at an education studies graduate school function in 2012. As I sat with other students at a meet-and-greet luncheon, we shared stories of how we each became interested in our graduate programs. During my turn, I related my experiences as an AmeriCorps volunteer in Washington, DC and how working with adult students with low academic skills had inspired me to make a career of education reform. Continue reading

Friday 5: High-Tech, Low-Tech, and ‘Oregon Trail’ In-Between

Buzzfeed, the internet king of list-making, offers “15 Things We Did At School That Future Students Will Never Understand.” This is a serious trip down educational memory lane. I have to admit that I really do miss chalk, but I certainly don’t miss overhead projectors. I once accidentally obliterated one in the 6th grade. Don’t ask me. I don’t want to talk about it. However, I’m ALWAYS willing to talk about ‘Oregon Trail,’ Continue reading

What I’ve Learned from Growing My Own Food

potatoesAn old friend and I have a saying: “The world would be a much better place if everyone grew their own potatoes.” It’s a political nerd reference to Thomas Jefferson’s belief that those who are close to the land are close to God, and as an extension have a greater appreciation for the importance of our relationship with what the natural world has to offer. It’s a back-to-basics belief that Continue reading

“Improbable Scholars”: Urban Students Can Get a Great Public Education, Too

abrazos

A nurturing culture is at the forefront of Union City’s success.

David L. Kirp’s 2013 book, Improbable Scholars: The Rebirth of a Great American School System and a Strategy for America’s Schools, shows us that the average urban school system can be a great one–but that takes a lot of doing. Kirp offers a case study of Union City, NJ, a small but heavily urban district comprised largely of first- and second-generation immigrants from Latin America. While many urban school districts languish, Continue reading

Friday 5: Finland, Swim Class, Sod Schoolhouses

The one-room schoolhouse is the stuff of legend in modern-day North America, and in an era when 4,000-student high schools are not uncommon, it’s easy to forget that one-room schools still exist. In “Lessons to be Learned from a One-Room Schoolhouse” from CBS News, we hear about how in some towns across the country, education is still flourishing the old-fashioned way. Continue reading

The Capitol Dome and Its Two Cities

Capitol DomeFor a year after I graduated from college, I worked as an educator in the shadow of one of the weightiest symbols in the world, the embodiment of all of the ideals that make up the great ideological experiment that is America. The Capitol Dome feels omnipresent when one travels around Washington, DC, and the city planners have made sure of that Continue reading

25 Years After Tiananmen, We’re Still Learning

tiananmen-vase-banner

“Don’t be a vase.”

“In darkness dwells a people which knows its annals not.”

                               –Ulrich B Phillips

So much of what happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989 is still unknown to the Chinese people and the rest of the world as a result of the active information suppression and distortion by the Chinese government.

They don’t want their people to know of the atrocities that the government committed there, but they also don’t want their people to know about the 7 weeks of non-violent, student-led demonstrations that preceded the bloodshed. Continue reading